A juror's Twitter rants weren't enough to secure a new trial for a plaintiff in a personal injury case.
October 05, 2016 at 02:00 AM
1 minute read
A juror’s Twitter rants weren’t enough to secure a new trial for a plaintiff in a personal injury case, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled Wednesday.
Juror No. 5 expressed anger during jury selection and trial while serving on a personal injury suit by plaintiff Michele L. Murphy against driver Michael B. Roth.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Duane Morris LLP seeks a highly motivated junior associate to join its dynamic and growing Labor and Employment Class Action group in Chicag...
Duane Morris LLP seeks a full-time staff litigation attorney who has practiced between 3-5 years. Experience will include drafting motions, ...
Duane Morris LLP has an immediate opening for a senior level, highly motivated litigation associate to join its dynamic and growing Employme...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
