Many in the fashion industry were pleasantly surprised when the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the copyright case Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands. The court granted certiorari to resolve widespread disagreement over the proper separability analysis to be applied in determining whether a design feature can be eligible for copyright separate and apart from the useful article incorporating it, write Danielle N. Garno and Alena M. Markey.
May 18, 2017 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Many in the fashion industry were pleasantly surprised when the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the copyright case Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands. The court granted certiorari to resolve widespread disagreement over the proper separability analysis to be applied in determining whether a design feature can be eligible for copyright separate and apart from the useful article incorporating it.
On March 22, the court issued its much-anticipated decision in the case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
