4th DCA Tosses 10-Year-Old Defamation Case

, Daily Business Review

   | 1 Comments

The Fourth District Court of Appeal brought a Miami attorney's defamation case to a close, ruling his opponent could not overcome a qualified privilege defense.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Dennis Myhre, AIC

    This decision would fall into place with issues investors may have, for example, with retirement investment accounts. It is not unusual when an investor loses, for example, his retirement savings in one account, to "warn" others by expressing his dislike for a certain investment, or for that matter, the insurance company that offered the investment as an option in a self-directed 401k plan. Our legal system should not be able to limit our freedom of speech to express our concern for the financial security of others by recommending they not invest in a certain insurance company separate acount, for example.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202650384911

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.