Madonna Strip Club Cites First Amendment In Bid To Reopen

, Daily Business Review

   |0 Comments

Club Madonna, a Miami Beach strip club, is suing the city in federal court in a bid to reverse its shutdown.

Shuttered after authorities alleged it allowed a 13-year-old girl to work the stripper pole, a Miami Beach erotic club is citing the First Amendment in a federal court bid to reopen its doors.

Club Madonna, a strip club at 1527 Washington Ave., is suing the city in a bid to reverse the municipally mandated closure of that venue.

On Friday, the city revoked Club Madonna's certificate of use for six months, noting the state investigation into the alleged sexual exploitation of a child. Specifically, City Manager Jimmy Morales cited news reports where Madonna's owner said he heard the girl, a young runaway, had performed in the club but had no first-hand knowledge of it.

Morales wrote in the revocation order that "the owner's admitted failure to have the required knowledge of what illegal activity occurs at Club Madonna" presents "an actual threat to the public health, welfare and safety of the residents of Miami Beach."

In a federal lawsuit filed Tuesday, Club Madonna claimed yanking its business license was an unwarranted violation of its First Amendment rights, was a capricious and arbitrary action, and was done in retaliation for previous legal squabbles.

Club Madonna objected to the characterization of alleged illegal activity as an "actual" threat to the public since the club management said it has taken steps to prevent such an incident from occurring again.

"There were no exigent circumstances or serious danger present which would justify the issuance of the revocation order without pre-deprivation notice and an opportunity to be heard," the lawsuit reads. The complaint was filed by Richard Wolfe of Wolfe Law in Miami. His co-counsel are Daniel Robert Aaronson and James Scott Benjamin of Benjamin & Aaronson in Fort Lauderdale.

The club ownership also questioned the city's authority to close the venue for six months "as opposed to, for argument's sake, six days."

On its First Amendment claims, the club said it "believes that providing this form of expressive communication to the public is a beneficial social activity which enhances individual's ability to assimilate and consider various issues involving sexual candor and the interest in human sexuality that all human beings have to a greater or lesser degree."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202638519884

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.