A fireworks company is not entitled to compensation for lost sales during a wildfire emergency right before the Fourth of July in 1998, the Second District Court of Appeal ruled.
December 07, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
With a fierce drought sparking wildfires across the state, then-Governor Lawton Chiles took the extraordinary step in 1998 of banning the sale and use of fireworks around the Fourth of July holiday.
More than 14 years after the smoke cleared, a state appeals court snuffed out a fireworks company’s arguments that it should receive more than $1 million from the state because of the ban.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
