Reznek v. Chase Home Finance, decided Dec. 10 by the Third District Court of Appeal, is an interesting case that deals with and clarifies the filing and use of an appellate Fla. Stat. §57.105(4) motion in conjunction with Fla. R. of App. P. 9.410(b)(3) and (b)(4). It also explains when a court may appropriately strike a §57.105 motion.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Spencer Eig denied appellant Dorit Reznek’s motion for entitlement to attorney fees and costs in a mortgage foreclosure case. Reznek appealed Eig’s denial.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]