Daily Business Review
  • Legal
  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Special Reports
  • Newsletters
  • Court Central
  • Public Notices
  • DBR Events
  • Products & Services
  • Classifieds

Home > Court imposes $8.25M penalty for sabotage of M&A Deal

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Court imposes $8.25M penalty for sabotage of M&A Deal

By Brendan Pierson Contact All Articles 

New York Law Journal

March 20, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Daredevil

Securities brokerage IDX Capital and its officers have won an $8.25 million judgment against a former business associate convicted of sabotaging a $25 million merger deal by sending the would-be buyer disparaging emails under pseudonyms, including the comic book character Daredevil.

The judgment in IDX Capital v. Phoenix Partners, 102806/07, was entered earlier this month by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Oing (See Profile), who presided over a jury trial.

At the heart of the case is an alleged vendetta pursued by defendant Wesley Wang against his ex-business partner James Cawley.

(Wang is not the same Wesley Wang who formerly worked at SAC Capital and has cooperated with the FBI in its ongoing insider-trading probe.)

Wang's history with Cawley goes back to 2002, when the two were among the founders of Axiom Global Partners, a broker of credit default swaps. Cawley was the CEO and Wang was the COO. According to the lawsuit, as the company grew, Wang and Cawley's relationship turned sour, partly because Cawley tried to restrain Wang's "excessive spending" of Axiom funds to entertain clients.

Eventually, Cawley came to believe that Wang was engaged in actual misconduct, including using Axiom funds to buy cocaine and helping to pass confidential information to an employee of JPMorgan Chase & Co., according to the complaint.

Their dispute came to a head in 2004, when Wang and his allies at the company began trying to force Cawley out. In 2005, they convinced a board member appointed by an outside investor to vote for Cawley's removal as CEO and succeeded in getting him removed.

Cawley responded by invoking the arbitration clause of Axiom's founding agreement. An arbitrator found that the vote removing Cawley was ineffective because the investor that appointed the board member who cast the deciding vote had secretly sold its shares, and had no right to a seat.

Cawley was reinstated, but Wang refused to accept the arbitrator's conclusion. The complaint alleges that Wang continued to try to push Cawley out, soliciting a report from an outside accounting firm that found that Cawley had misappropriated $79,000 from Axiom. According to the complaint, the accounting firm never interviewed Cawley, who could have proven that the report was false.

Wang eventually initiated a proceeding in Manhattan Supreme Court to dissolve Axiom. That case eventually settled, with Wang and his allies leaving to form a new firm, Phoenix Partners, and Cawley going on to form IDX. As part of the agreement, Wang agreed not to disparage Cawley.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Patton Boggs

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Oing
  • IDX Capital
  • SAC Capital
  • Morris & Fox
  • Axiom Global Partners
  • Knight Capital Group Inc.
  • Phoenix, Arizona Partners
  • New York Post Company
  • Marvel Comics
  • Supreme Court
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Carlton Fields Talks Merger With Jorden Burt
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  2. South Florida Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight
    •      
  3. Developer Wants $1M Back After Failed Trump Plaza Deal
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Florida Hopes To Attract Businesses With LLC Change
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. Howard Stern Reportedly Buys Palm Beach Compound
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About Daily Business Review | Contact Daily Business Review | Advertise with Us | Sitemap

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media