Daily Business Review
  • Legal
  • Real Estate
  • Finance
  • Special Reports
  • Newsletters
  • Court Central
  • Public Notices
  • DBR Events
  • Products & Services
  • Classifieds

Home > Mom's Facebook post about son triggers loss of custody

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Mom's Facebook post about son triggers loss of custody

By John Caher All Articles 

New York Law Journal

February 20, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A mother who swears and yells at her 10-year-old son and called him an "asshole" on Facebook because that is what "he is" and said it is important that her Facebook friends know the truth demonstrated a "lack of insight," an Albany appellate panel has held in awarding a father sole custody.

The Appellate Division, Third Department, last week agreed with St. Lawrence County Family Court Judge Barbara Potter, who has since retired, that joint custody is no longer viable and awarded sole custody of the three children to the father.

Matter of Melody M. v. Robert M., 513361, began when the mother sought to change the visitation schedule and the father sought sole custody.

Records show that the oldest child suffers from mental health issues and undergoes counseling. The mother does not participate in the counseling because she does not like the counselor, uses physical force to restrain the boy, and tends to yell at her son and disparage him, according to court records.

Potter declined to alter the visitation schedule, awarded the father sole custody and imposed an order of protection barring the mother from posting communications about the children on any social network site. The mother appealed, and the Third Department unanimously affirmed.

"[T]here was sufficient evidence regarding the mother's inappropriate use of the Internet to demean and disparage the oldest child, as well as her lack of remorse or insight into the inappropriateness of such behavior, so as to justify the court's issuance of the order of protection," Justice Robert Rose (See Profile) wrote for the court.

Also on the panel were Justices Edward Spain (See Profile), Leslie Stein (See Profile) and William McCarthy (See Profile).

John Cirando of Syracuse argued for the mother. The father was represented by Luke Babbie of Poissant, Nichols & Grue in Malone and Verner Ingram Jr. of Potsdam appeared for the children.

Cirando said the order of protection barring the mother from mentioning her children on social media has potential negative consequences.

"It is unfortunate that it prevents her from telling all of her friends that her son hit a game-winning home run in a baseball game or scored the winning goal or was on the honor roll," Cirando said.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Poissant, Nichols & Grue
  • New York State Office of Victim Services
  • Appellate Division
  • Third Department

Key categories

    
  • State and Local Courts

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bank Of America Overdraft Ruling Reversed
    •      
  2. Becker & Poliakoff Policy Withholding 20% Of Partner Pay, Not A Popular One
    •      
  3. Attorney Turns Loss At 3rd DCA Into A Win For His Condo Association Client
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  4. Brickell's Growth Creates Major Parking Problem
    •      
  5. Related Group Reinvents Itself As Diversified Real Estate Developer
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About Daily Business Review | Contact Daily Business Review | Advertise with Us | Sitemap

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media